Hi Leander. Thanks for posting.
>>>"Why has knowledge of this relationship not been made known before now?"
As far as I can tell, we only just became aware of this issue within the last month or so. My understanding is someone "stumbled" upon the UN-NGO website, wherein the WTS is listed as an ngo. The investigation took off from there.
>>>"Has the Society admitted or acknowledged their relationship with the UN?"
Absolutely not.
>>>"Are all religious organizations required to have some type of connection with the UN?"
Absolutely not. It was a completely voluntary motion by the WTS, who solicited the UN for association.
>>>"Could the fact that the Society has international interests mean that its a necessity to have links with the UN?"
There is no denying this move aids the WTS with their international interests, but that does not make such an association a necessity. As I mentioned, this was a voluntary step taken by the WTS.
Bottom line, the WTS has entered an agreement to "support" the organization they claim to be the scarlet beast/disgusting thing. They have committed to support the beast, and devote a portion of their information programme (ie: WT journals) to promoting the beast's agenda.
For me, the problem is not supporting the UN; for me the problem is the gross hypocrisy.
TS,